![]() I can upload the file(s) in question if needed (although the afphoto file is 100MB).Įdited March 26 by problem you have is not really a bug and it's not new. I guess for now I'll use Bicubic for any reduced exports. I'll assume that now alerted, Serif can do whatever testing is required to identify the scope of the issue. Also, I've not tried reducing the size first, then exporting it - This is all done via the export dialog because the other way requires too much undoing, etc. ![]() But it's clearly happening per the examples above. I've not exhaustively gone through each and every possible permutation of algorithm, size, image format, tool, etc. But I don't see them at all in the 100% exports, nor in the original Photo document. After looking VERY closely even the 2048 Bicubic export does actually show artifacts very faintly. So it appears maybe (?) both reduction and / or Lanczos can cause artifacts, with stronger reductions making them more visible. * After later exporting the same image twice using Bicubic with reductions in size to 20 on the long edge, the 1080 version does in fact show a slight artifact, but it's faint. The end result is, only* the Lanczos 3 reduced exports show artifacts and the Non-separable algorithm is far worse than Separable, although artifacts can be faintly seen in the Separable exports as well. So, I then exported test samples using Bicubic, Bilinear, Lanczos 3 Separable and Lanczos 3 Non-Separable algorithms, both full size and reduced to 2048 pixels on the long vertical edge (my usual web export size). The resulting image showed outline artifacts around all the inpainted edits, for example (enlarged screenshot): When I exported the image as a JPG, per my standard procedure I resized it down using the Lanczos 3 Non-separable algorithm. I used an additional layer for the edits and set the inpainting brush to Current Layer & Below (to protect the pixel layer): I have a TIFF (nature scene) in which I used the inpainting brush to remove some visually distracting details. Photo 2.1.0 beta 1732, Windows 11 (I don't recall seeing this in earlier betas, but I don't have them installed any more)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |